Moving Out of State With Sole Custody
The California law affecting a sole custody parent’s right to move out of state with a child is complicated, and has evolved over the years based on new court rulings in such cases, but there is a general legal principle that a parent with sole custody has a “presumptive right” to move away with a child out of the state. A presumptive right means that the law will presume that the parent can do this, but the other parent can nevertheless raise objections which a court may use to prevent the child from being taken out of the state.
The Parent Does Not Have to Prove the Move is “Necessary”
When the other parent does raise objections to a custodial parent attempting to move out of state with the child, the court will, again, give deference to the parent’s attempt and there is no requirement that that parent show that the move is “necessary.” At the same time, California courts do operate on a guiding principle of encouraging ongoing contact between the child and both parents after a divorce, and so the courts will take the ability of the child to have continuing relations with the other parent into consideration when evaluating the move.
Ultimately, the courts are concerned solely with the best interests of the child when evaluating custody situations and not in how a proposed situation affects the parents, and continuing contact with both parents, while important, is not the only matter it will consider. If a parent wants to move for reasons that will benefit the child, such as better employment prospects and closer contact with extended family, this will factor into the child’s best interests and may override the concern about contact with the other parent, especially where such contact was limited prior to the proposed move.
But if a parent is seeking to move out of state as a way of preventing contact with the other parent, the court may consider this “bad faith” and not approve the move. Such evaluations are complicated due to the fact that, in the words of the Supreme Court of California, “Absolute concepts of good faith versus bad faith often are difficult to apply because human beings may act for a complex variety of sometimes conflicting motives.” This is certainly often the case where there is an interstate move involving a child.
A Court Can Also Reevaluate the Custody Decision
One important thing to keep in mind is that a noncustodial parent always has the right to ask a court for a modification where there is a significant change of circumstances, and an out-of-state move will likely be considered a change of circumstances. In such a case, the court can reevaluate whether the best interests of the child would be served by remaining in the same state. If the custodial parent nonetheless insists on moving to another state, this could precipitate a change in custody.
In all cases, both parents in situations involving out-of-state moves should consult with an experienced California family law attorney to determine their options.
Get Help in Your Custody Matter
The Pasadena attorneys at Kearney | Baker work with clients across Southern California in helping them reach the best possible results for parents and children alike. For help with any family law matter you are facing, please contact the experienced, compassionate attorneys at Kearney Baker today at 626-768-2945.